Search for: All records

Data published in this zip file complement the publication "Does total column ozone change during a solar eclipse?" by Germar H. Bernhard, George T. Janson, Scott Simpson, Raúl R. Cordero,  Edgardo I. Sepúlveda Araya, Jose Jorquera, Juan A. Rayas, and Randall N. Lind, which will be published in the journal "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics". A DOI of the publication will be added to this meta data description when available. The DOI of the publication's pre-print (paper under review) is: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2659 The contents of the zip file are organized in the following four subdirectories: - Figures: This directory contains the figures of the paper in PDF and PNG format plus the data used for plotting the figures. - GUVis-3511 Data Processor: This directory contains the software for processing the raw data collected during the solar eclipses described in the publication as well as ancillary data used for processing and manuals describing the software. - Limb darkening functions: This directory contains the functions expressing the change in the spectral irradiance during the eclipses discussed in the publication as a function of time and wavelength. - Raw data: This directory contains the raw data measured during the eclipses discussed in the publication. Each subdirectory and subdirectories nested therein contains "readme.txt" (in English) and "léeme_Espanol.txt" (in Spanish) files with further information of the contents of each subdirectory. 

Abstract. Several publications have reported that total column ozone (TCO) may oscillate with an amplitude of up to 10 DU (Dobson units) during a solar eclipse, whereas other researchers have not seen evidence that an eclipse leads to variations in TCO beyond the typical natural variability. Here, we try to resolve these contradictions by measuring short-term variations (of seconds to minutes) in TCO using “global” (Sun and sky) and direct-Sun observations in the ultraviolet (UV) range with filter radiometers (GUVis-3511 and Microtops II®). Measurements were performed during three solar eclipses: the “Great American Eclipse” of 2024, which was observed in Mazatlán, Mexico, on 8 April 2024; a partial solar eclipse that took place in the United States on 14 October 2023 and was observed at Fort Collins, Colorado (40.57° N, 105.10° W); and a total solar eclipse that occurred in Antarctica on 4 December 2021 and was observed at Union Glacier (79.76° S, 82.84° W). The upper limits of the amplitude of oscillations in TCO observed at Mazatlán, Fort Collins, and Antarctica were 0.4 %, 0.3 %, and 0.03 %, respectively. The variability at all sites was within that observed during times not affected by an eclipse. The slightly larger variability at Mazatlán is due to cirrus clouds occurring throughout the day of the eclipse and the difficulty of separating changes in the ozone layer from cloud effects. These results support the conclusion that a solar eclipse does not lead to variations in TCO of more than ± 1.2 DU and that these variations are likely much lower, drawing into question reports of much larger oscillations. In addition to calculating TCO, we also present changes in the spectral irradiance and aerosol optical depth during eclipses and compare radiation levels observed during totality. The new results augment our understanding of the effect of a solar eclipse on the Earth's upper atmosphere. 

Abstract. Several publications have reported that total column ozone (TCO) may oscillate with an amplitude of up to 10 Dobson Units during a solar eclipse while other researchers have not seen evidence that an eclipse leads to variations in TCO beyond the typical natural variability. Here, we try to resolve these contradictions by measuring short-term (seconds to minutes) variations in TCO using “global” (Sun and sky) and direct-Sun observations in the ultraviolet (UV) range with filter radiometers (GUVis-3511 and Microtops). Measurements were performed during three solar eclipses: the Great American Eclipse of 2024, which was observed in Mazatlán, Mexico, on 8 April 2024; a partial solar eclipse taking place in the United States on 14 October 2023 and observed at Fort Collins, Colorado (40.57° N, 105.10° W); and a total solar eclipse occurring in Antarctica on 4 December 2021 and observed at Union Glacier (79.76° S, 82.84° W). The upper limit of the amplitude of oscillations in TCO observed at Mazatlán, Fort Collins, and Antarctica were 0.7 %, 0.3 %, and 0.03 %, respectively. The variability at all sites was within that observed during times not affected by an eclipse. The larger variability at Mazatlán is likely due to cirrus clouds occurring throughout the day of the eclipse and the difficulty of separating changes in the ozone layer from cloud effects. These results support the conclusion that a solar eclipse does not lead to variations in TCO of more than ± 2 Dobson Units and likely much less, drawing into question reports of much larger oscillations. In addition to calculating TCO, we also present changes in the spectral irradiance and aerosol optical depth during eclipses and compare radiation levels observed during totality. The new results augment our understanding of the effect of a solar eclipse on the Earth's upper atmosphere. 

Abstract This Assessment Update by the Environmental Effects Assessment Panel (EEAP) of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) considers the interactive effects of solar UV radiation, global warming, and other weathering factors on plastics. The Assessment illustrates the significance of solar UV radiation in decreasing the durability of plastic materials, degradation of plastic debris, formation of micro- and nanoplastic particles and accompanying leaching of potential toxic compounds. Micro- and nanoplastics have been found in all ecosystems, the atmosphere, and in humans. While the potential biological risks are not yet well-established, the widespread and increasing occurrence of plastic pollution is reason for continuing research and monitoring. Plastic debris persists after its intended life in soils, water bodies and the atmosphere as well as in living organisms. To counteract accumulation of plastics in the environment, the lifetime of novel plastics or plastic alternatives should better match the functional life of products, with eventual breakdown releasing harmless substances to the environment.